BROCKSTAR BY BRIAN NELSON WILLIS |
United States, California, Newport Beach |
|
Consumer reviews about BROCKSTAR BY BRIAN NELSON WILLIS |
brockstar28
|
Dec 9, 2020
|
BROCKSTAR BY BRIAN NELSON WILLIS949-208-0028 2618 San Miguel Drive Unit 218, United States, California, Newport Beach https://www.reviewstalk.com/complaints-reviews/brockstar-by-brian-nelson-willis-l38106.html
BROCKSTAR BY BRIAN NELSON WILLIS
BROCKSTAR AND BRIAN NELSON WILLIS FILE 3.5 MILLION USD SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT
BROCKSTAR GROUP AND BRIAN NELSON WILLIS FILE 3.5 MILLION USD SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT!
BROCKSTAR SETTLED WITH HOLBROOK AND BEVRIDGE PRINCIPALS AN AMOUNT IN EXCESS OF 3.5 MILLION USD TO THE BENEFIT OR THE BROCKSTAR GROUP OF COMPANIES AND BRIAN NELSON WILLIS WITH AN ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP OF THE JUDGMENT TO MR. WILLIS AND BROCKSTAR OF THE 3.5 MILLION USD DEBT! THIS DEBT IS NOW NULL AND VOID AS ARE ALSO THE ABOVE AFOREMENTION SUPPOSED CASES AS FOLLOWS.
1. ONYX V. WILLIS, this case dismissed with prejudice. Mr. Willis bought the BMW and paid cash in full!
2. HOLBROOK V. WILLIS, this case settled in full by BROCKSTAR AND MR. WILLIS with the amount of 3.5 million USD plus, paid in full per ATTACHED ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT FILED WITH COURT!
3. McEACHIN V. WILLIS, this case settled and paid in full.
4. MADDLE V. WILLIS, this case settled and paid in full by Mr. Willis numerous years ago per Stipulated Judgment.
5. NAUDEAU V. WILLIS, THIS CASE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH MR. WILLIS AND WAS A DIFFERENT INDIVIDUAL!!
6. SEAPORT MANAGEMENT V. WILLIS, THIS CASE WAS FILED AGAINST NUMEROUS OTHER INDIVIDUALS AND MR. WILLIS DROPPED ENTIRELY AS A DEFENDENT IN THE CASE! MR. WILLIS SERVED ONLY AS A WITNESS IN THIS CASE AGAINST THE ACTUAL DEFENDENTS!!
7. GOMIRROR, LLC V. WILLIS, THE CASE IS A BOGUS COMPLAINT AND IS CURRENTLY SUBJECT TO AN APPEAL!!
8. LICHTENSTEIN V. WILLIS, THE CASE IS THE MOST HUMEROUS WHEREAS LICHTENSTEIN FILED THE CASE TWICE AGAINST BROCKSTAR AND MR. WILLIS AND THEN DISMISSED THE CASE TWICE AND THE LAST TIME DISMISSING THE CASE WITH PREJUDICE!!
9. BEVERLY RIDGE V. WILLIS, THIS CASE WAS SETTLED TO THE BENEFIT OF MR. WILLIS IN THE AMOUNT OF 3.5 MILLION USD, WHEREAS MR. WILLIS ACCEPTED THE HOLBROOK JUDGMENT AS SETTLEMENT!
|
brockstar28
|
Dec 9, 2020
|
BROCKSTAR BY BRIAN NELSON WILLIS949-208-0028 2618 San Miguel Drive Unit 218, 2618 San Miguel Drive Unit 218, United States, California, Newport Beach https://www.reviewstalk.com/complaints-reviews/brockstar-by-brian-nelson-willis-l54276.html#images
BROCKSTAR BY BRIAN NELSON WILLIS
BROCKSTAR BY BRIAN NELSON WILLIS
BROCKSTAR AND BRIAN NELSON WILLIS FILE 3.5 MILLION USD SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT
BROCKSTAR GROUP AND BRIAN NELSON WILLIS FILE 3.5 MILLION USD SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT!
BROCKSTAR SETTLED WITH HOLBROOK AND BEVRIDGE PRINCIPALS AN AMOUNT IN EXCESS OF 3.5 MILLION USD TO THE BENEFIT OR THE BROCKSTAR GROUP OF COMPANIES AND BRIAN NELSON WILLIS WITH AN ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP OF THE JUDGMENT TO MR. WILLIS AND BROCKSTAR OF THE 3.5 MILLION USD DEBT! THIS DEBT IS NOW NULL AND VOID AS ARE ALSO THE ABOVE AFOREMENTION SUPPOSED CASES AS FOLLOWS.
1. ONYX V. WILLIS, this case dismissed with prejudice. Mr. Willis bought the BMW and paid cash in full!
2. HOLBROOK V. WILLIS, this case settled in full by BROCKSTAR AND MR. WILLIS with the amount of 3.5 million USD plus, paid in full per ATTACHED ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT FILED WITH COURT!
3. McEACHIN V. WILLIS, this case settled and paid in full.
4. MADDLE V. WILLIS, this case settled and paid in full by Mr. Willis numerous years ago per Stipulated Judgment.
5. NAUDEAU V. WILLIS, THIS CASE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH MR. WILLIS AND WAS A DIFFERENT INDIVIDUAL!!
6. SEAPORT MANAGEMENT V. WILLIS, THIS CASE WAS FILED AGAINST NUMEROUS OTHER INDIVIDUALS AND MR. WILLIS DROPPED ENTIRELY AS A DEFENDENT IN THE CASE! MR. WILLIS SERVED ONLY AS A WITNESS IN THIS CASE AGAINST THE ACTUAL DEFENDENTS!!
7. GOMIRROR, LLC V. WILLIS, THE CASE IS A BOGUS COMPLAINT AND IS CURRENTLY SUBJECT TO AN APPEAL!!
8. LICHTENSTEIN V. WILLIS, THE CASE IS THE MOST HUMEROUS WHEREAS LICHTENSTEIN FILED THE CASE TWICE AGAINST BROCKSTAR AND MR. WILLIS AND THEN DISMISSED THE CASE TWICE AND THE LAST TIME DISMISSING THE CASE WITH PREJUDICE!!
9. BEVERLY RIDGE V. WILLIS, THIS CASE WAS SETTLED TO THE BENEFIT OF MR. WILLIS IN THE AMOUNT OF 3.5 MILLION USD, WHEREAS MR. WILLIS ACCEPTED THE HOLBROOK JUDGMENT AS SETTLEMENT!
| |
|
|
Previous 1 Next |
|
|