no accreditation

I have a degree in clinical nutrition from a prestigious university. The year I spent at IIN taught me more useful, productive, and life changing information than my entire time at university (coupled with university teaching you a traditional approach that from personal experience, I know simply does not work.

The information posted above is also incorrect. There is a tremendous amount of information you need to study at IIN, and you are tested throughout the year. My only regret is the tens of thousands I spent on a "traditional" accredited school when for a fraction of the price I feel much more educated, well informed, and much healthier in and of myself (90lbs lighter and now a holistic coach and a yoga instructor as a result of this course). I've changed my life and changed many lives for my clients as a result.

One day you may learn to be non-judgmental about a program you have never even completed.

And seriously... there is no way I would go to a traditional "registered dietician" and put my life in their hands any more than i'd pay the slightest bit of attention to the "USDA food pyramid". Their education is based on a seriously flawed understanding of the role nutrition plays in a healthy body. Isn't there a warning bell in the back of your mind when you see that this nation is becoming sicker and sicker, 1 in 5 die of cancer (and that is a conservative statistic). Drink your milk like your "registered dietician" tells you to, without the knowledge of the multiple clinical trials that conclusively show a direct correlation between pasteurized milk and a rise in all sort so conditions, none greater than osteoporosis (hint: osteoporosis is at an all-time high in the USA despite what the dieticians preach you to do about it).

There is one word for people who blindly follow those who were educated by the traditional education system in the USA with regard to health: sheeple (people who are like sheep and blindly follow those who have no true idea what they are doing).