McMillan Law Firm La Mesa
6192340884
4670 Nebo Drive4670 NBe, United States, California, La Mesa
mcmillanlaw.us
Bryan Rho Fraud McMillan Law Firm San Diego
Bryan Rho , McMillan Law Firm, La Mesa, California, 4670 Nebo Drive, La Mesa, CA, appears to have lost many significant cases while working for the failed law firm.
In January 2020, the Ninth Circuit denied San Diego attorney Scott McMillan’s appeal for his failed lawsuit to remove internet posts critical about his law firm finding that the defendant(s) did nothing wrong. See the Ninth Circuit court order affirming dismissal. The Ninth Circuit did not need a long opinion to hash out the issues Scott McMillan put before them in hundreds of pages of briefing. Ultimately, the appellate court issued a simplistic four-page opinion stating his RICO lawsuit and allegations of extortion were without merit by stating in part: “Plaintiffs failed to allege extortionate conduct…” and “The district court also properly dismissed the conspiracy claim because the “failure to adequately plead a substantive violation of RICO precludes a claim for conspiracy.””
In October 2020, Karass v. Stirlen (In re Stirlen), United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division Bankruptcy Case No. 17 B 06666, Chapter 7, Adversary Case No. 17 A 00424, the appellate court denied Scott McMillan’s lengthy appeal. Literally each and every of a dozen errors claims by Scott McMillan were discarded by the court.
The last stop for the Scott McMillan loser train was decided November 2020 where the Fifth District Court of Appeal based in Fresno found the third appeal in the same case of The McMillan Law Firm La Mesa, California was doomed. In this case, Scott McMillan appealed the loss. The court said, “On appeal, plaintiffs contend Rosen’s declaration “failed to affirmatively establish personal knowledge of the facts attested to as required by section 437c[, subdivision ](d)…Here, we find no abuse of discretion.” Court of Appeal Case No. F074947.
Since 2017, Scott McMillan, The McMillan Law Firm, 4670 Nebo Drive, La Mesa, Ca has lost the below cases in the Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division (San Diego):
Case No. D076869 Trial Court Case No. 37-2016-00015444-CU-OE-CTL Taylor et al. v. Financial Casualty & Surety, Inc.
Case No. D075706 Trial Court Case No. 37-2016-00015444-CU-OE-CTL Taylor v. The Superior Court of San Diego County/Fugitive Recovery Investigations, Inc.
Case No. D072367 Trial Court Case No. 37-2016-00015444-CU-OE-CTL Taylor et al. v. The Superior Court of San Diego County/Fugitive Recovery International, Inc. et al.
Case No. D072367 Trial Court Case No. 37-2016-00015444-CU-OE-CTL Taylor et al. v. The Superior Court of San Diego County/Fugitive Recovery International, Inc. et al.
Case No. D072154 Trial Court Case No. 37-2010-00102377-CU-OR-CTL Kindt v. The Superior Court of San Diego County/Trango Systems, Inc.
Case No. D071707 Trial Court Case No. 37-2016-00022104-CU-BC-CTL Farhan v. The Superior Court of San Diego County/La Mesa Springs Center, LLC
It appears San Diego attorney Bryan Rhowas also employed by The_McMillan_Law_Firm when it lost a couple of other major cases in federal court
• 9th Circuit judge berated McMillan a few months ago for filing a “silly” lawsuit against the ATF, not based on principle. https://vimeo.com/229474298 (attached video) McMillan also filed a declaration alleging ATF agents stole property as “war booty”, vandalized property of his client’s gun store, and intimidated him.
• McMillan sued for fraud in federal court by a large firm; lawsuit survived motion to dismiss, and McMillan cross-sued the victim. https://legalnewsline.com/stories/510992237-the-mcmillan-law-firm-allegedly-sent-inflated-bill-to-client.
The above demonstrates why it is so important to scrutinize the attorney you want to represent you. Issues like the above are things judges know of and worst blogs like this are things a jurors see.
| |
